Quantcast
Channel: Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal – SelfAwarePatterns
Viewing all 37 articles
Browse latest View live

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

$
0
0

SMBCParent

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal.

This seemed tangentially related to my post about HuffPost’s new commenting policy and subsequent discussion.

If you’re not already reading Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal, you’re missing out on a lot of awesome philosophical insight with an often hilarious bent.

Click through to read the rest.


Tagged: HuffPost, Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal, Zach Weiner

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal: The Adventures Of Philosophically Inclined Mailman

SMBC: Momentary molecular arrangements

SMBC:Revolution: A Guide

SMBC: A fable

SMBC: Why the universe isn’t deterministic

SMBC: Sperm cosmology

SMBC: You can’t prove it isn’t true


One Plus One Equals Two. ALLEGEDLY. — The Nib — Medium

SMBC: The evil mathematical universe

SMBC: Math and the universe

SMB: A psychology experiment and nature versus nurture

SMBC: We’re constantly dying

SMBC: Surpassing the Turing test in order to assess moral standing

SMBC: Free will and personal responsibility


SMBC: Technicality Club

SMBC: The curse of knowledge

$
0
0

Click through for full sized version.

via Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal.

This strip reminds me of something I heard someone say in a presentation on communication strategies several years ago.  It was a concept the speaker referred to as “the curse of knowledge”.  The curse of knowledge is the idea that when you know something, it is often very difficult to see things from the perspective of people who don’t know that thing, particularly if it’s something you’ve known for a long time.

For example, once you understand the vast array of cultural norms and practices that exist across humanity, many of our cultural taboos become obviously arbitrary, such as the one against homosexuality.  When interacting with someone who does not understand that, it can be very difficult to put yourself in their shoes and understand where they’re coming from.  It can also be very easy to demonize them, when often their main failing is a simple lack of knowledge.

I often find this to be an important thing to remember when dealing with younger people, which as a manager at a university, I have lots of opportunity to do.  I regularly have to remind myself of how limited my own understanding of many things were when I was 20 years old, particularly my understanding of human relations.  When I do succeed in that reminder, I’m often struck by how much more intelligent and knowledgeable today’s young people are than my generation was at that age.  (We had TV to teach us, but not the internet.)

The curse of knowledge is important to keep in mind when you’re trying to convince someone of anything.  Often their resistance is rooted in things they don’t know, things we may have come to see as obvious.  Success in convincing them may hinge on figuring out where that lack of knowledge exists, and finding a respectful and effective way to bring them up to speed.  (Of course, as the strip suggests, it’s always possible that their resistance is rooted in something we don’t know; a possibility we always have to be open to.)


Tagged: communication strategies, Culture, Knowledge, Politics, Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal, Society, the curse of knowledge

Who was the first person to have an afterlife?

$
0
0

Click through for full sized version and the red button caption.

via Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal.

The idea that only humans have an afterlife has always been one that I find interesting.  If only humans have them, at what point in our evolutionary history did we obtain them?  Did Neanderthals have them?  What about Homo-erectus?  If we started having an afterlife at some point, wouldn’t that mean that the first person to be eligible for one couldn’t expect to have their parents there?

I know that many religious believers think animals do have an afterlife.  But that just seems to move the line of difficulty.  How far back on the evolutionary chain do we have to go before an afterlife doesn’t come into the equation?  Is it just animals?  Or do plants have them as well?  Is the spinach I had on my Subway  sandwich at lunch today in spinach heaven?  If only animals, what about animal-plant hybrids like green sea slugs?

I personally think it’s unlikely that we have an afterlife waiting for us, but I could see humans conceivably creating one someday.  Which raises an interesting question.  Suppose we developed technology that would allow us to somehow put the minds of long dead relatives into a technological afterlife*.  No doubt those relatives would also want to see their long dead relatives in that afterlife.

How far back would we allow it to go?  Would we stop after anatomically modern humans, or continue until whoever was being resurrected wasn’t intelligent enough to care about their parents?  Or at some other point?

* No, I don’t know of any laws of physics that would allow this, but some transhumanists have speculated about it.


Tagged: Afterlife, Evolution, Heaven, Human evolution, Religion, Religious belief, Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal, Singularity, Transhumanism

SMBC: Proof altruism exists?

I would draw a similar graph for FTL and knowledge of physics

Viewing all 37 articles
Browse latest View live